Are Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness

SSRN Author Page for Jerry Kang
Are Ideal Litigators White? Measuring the Myth of Colorblindness


Abstract:
This study examined whether explicit and implicit biases in favor of Whites and against Asian Americans would alter mock jurors' evaluation of a litigator's deposition. We found evidence of both explicit bias as measured by self-reports, and implicit bias as measured by two Implicit Association Tests. In particular, explicit stereotypes that the ideal litigator was White predicted worse evaluation of the Asian American litigator (outgroup derogation); by contrast, implicit stereotypes predicted preferential evaluation of the White litigator (ingroup favoritism). In sum, participants were not colorblind, at least implicitly, towards even a "model minority," and these biases produced racial discrimination. This study provides further evidence of the predictive and ecological validity of the Implicit Association Test.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Study Guide –Desmond and Emirbayer, Chapter 2

Study Guide –Desmond and Emirbayer, Chapter 2 1.        When did the term “race” obtain its modern meaning? 2.        Which two European countries, according to the authors, had more influence than others in creating the system of racial classification we know today? 3.        During the fourteenth century, which country’s citizens were regarded as nothing short of “savages” to England? 4.        What form of identity could we see in its beginning stages within fifteenth century Spain? 5.        Which term refers to a historical era marked by the rise of nationalism, development of capitalism, global expansion, and disenchantment of the world and rapid growth of scientific knowledge? 6.        What term refers to when a foreign power invades a territory and establishes en...
Read more

Stereotype threat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image
Stereotype threat - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia The phenomenon was later examined by the social psychologists Claude Steele and Joshua Aronson, who articulated the mechanism of "stereotype threat" that contributes to test performance of minority groups. In one such study, Steele and Aronson (1995) administered the Graduate Record Examination to European American and African American students. Half of each group was told that their intelligence was being measured, while the other half didn't know what the test was measuring. The European American students performed almost equally in the two conditions of the experiment. African Americans, in contrast, performed far worse than they otherwise would have when they were told their intelligence was being measured. The researchers concluded this was because stereotype threat made the students anxious about confirming the stereotype regarding African American IQ. The researchers found that the difference was even more notice...
Read more

Welcome

Welcome to SOC6.blogspot.com. This semester I will be using this blog to communicate to students in my SOC 6 classes. Email me at fha@cuesta.edu with your comments on the effectiveness of this blog.
Read more